Fumonisins in swine: the hidden cost of subclinical exposure

In Brief

  • Fumonisins are among the most common mycotoxins in corn-based diets.
  • Most exposure in commercial systems is subclinical without obvious signs but with measurable biological and economic impact.
  • Fumonisins disrupt sphingolipid metabolism, affecting gut integrity, immune function, liver metabolism, and nutrient utilization.
  • Guidance levels help prevent overt toxicity, but performance losses can occur below these levels. 

Introduction

While high fumonisin levels are associated with clinical conditions such as porcine pulmonary edema, most commercial systems experience chronic, low to moderate exposure. Pigs often appear normal, yet underlying biological changes reduce efficiency, increase variability, and impact overall performance.

Why Fumonisins Matter: Mode of Action

Fumonisins disrupt sphingolipid metabolism by inhibiting ceramide synthase, leading to:

  • Altered cell membrane integrity
  • Increased sphinganine to sphingosine (Sa:So) ratio
  • Impaired cellular signaling

These changes affect key systems, particularly the gut, liver, and immune system (Wang et al., 1991; Merrill et al., 2001).

In practical terms: cells become less efficient at absorbing nutrients, maintaining barrier function, and responding to stress, leading to poorer gut health, weaker immunity, and reduced performance.

Subclinical Impact on Pigs

Growth and Feed Efficiency

Reduced average daily gain and feed efficiency can occur even when feed intake appears normal, increasing days to market and cost per unit of gain (Rotter et al., 1996).

Gut Health and Nutrient Absorption

Disruption of intestinal integrity reduces nutrient uptake and increases susceptibility to enteric challenges (Bracarense et al., 2012).

This includes reduced absorption of amino acids, energy, and fat soluble vitamins A, D, and E.

Immune Function

Fumonisins can influence immune responses, increasing variability in disease outcomes and reducing resilience under stress (Grenier & Oswald, 2011).

Metabolic and Organ Function

Liver stress reduces efficiency in nutrient utilization, including:

  • Vitamin A, D, and E metabolism
  • Energy metabolism such as lipid metabolism and gluconeogenesis (Grenier & Oswald, 2011; EFSA, 2014)

Interpreting Fumonisin Levels in Practice

In the United States, the FDA provides guidance for fumonisins, including 20 ppm in complete swine diets when corn and corn by-products do not exceed 50% of the ration. These values are intended to prevent overt toxicity and protect animal health and the food supply.

Extension resources, including those from Kansas State University, often describe fumonisin effects based on observable clinical outcomes:

  • <20 ppm: no signs
  • 50–100 ppm: low feed intake, low growth rate, immunosuppression
  • >100 ppm: severe lung lesions, labored breathing, cyanosis, and death

However, these reflect visible outcomes, not full biological impact.

Research shows that cellular and physiological changes occur before clinical signs appear, affecting gut integrity, immune response, and nutrient utilization (Riley et al., 1993; Rotter et al., 1996; Grenier and Oswald, 2011).

What does it mean in practical terms: “no signs” does not mean no impact, subclinical effects can still reduce performance and efficiency.

Why Subclinical Risk Is Often Missed

Fumonisin-related losses are often underestimated because:

  • Effects are gradual rather than acute
  • Animals appear outwardly normal
  • Nutritional programs appear adequate on paper
  • Losses show up as variability rather than mortality
  • Co-contamination and stress can amplify impact

Fumonisins therefore act as a performance risk multiplier, particularly under real-world production conditions.

Managing Fumonisin Risk

An effective approach includes:

  • Monitoring
    Routine feed testing to track exposure.
  • Interpretation
    Evaluate total diet, production phase, and health status.
  • Targeted Mitigation
    Enzymatic biotransformation provides a targeted option for fumonisin management. FUMzyme® converts fumonisins into hydrolyzed forms with reduced biological activity, helping reduce exposure in the gastrointestinal tract. Feeding trials have demonstrated reductions in fumonisin biomarkers (e.g., SA:SO ratio) and improved biological responses under challenge conditions (Heinl et al., 2010; Masching et al., 2016; Paczosa et al 2025).

Conclusion

Fumonisins are a consistent and often underestimated challenge. Most losses occur under subclinical conditions where pigs appear normal but operate below their potential.

By affecting gut integrity, immune function, liver metabolism, and nutrient utilization, fumonisins create a hidden drag on performance.

  • Guidance levels prevent clinical issues
  • Performance losses can occur below those levels

Managing fumonisin risk is therefore not only about meeting guidance values, but about protecting consistency, efficiency, and overall productivity.

Bracarense, A.P.F.L., Lucioli, J., Grenier, B., Drociunas Pacheco, G., Moll, W.D., Schatzmayr, G., Oswald, I.P., 2012. Chronic ingestion of deoxynivalenol and fumonisins, alone or in combination, induces morphological and immunological changes in the intestine of pigs. Toxicology 299, 58–65.

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), 2014. Scientific opinion on the risks for animal and public health related to the presence of modified forms of certain mycotoxins in feed. EFSA Journal 12, 3916.

FDA, 2001. Guidance for Industry: Fumonisin Levels in Human Foods and Animal Feeds. Center for Veterinary Medicine, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, MD.

Grenier, B., Oswald, I.P., 2011. Mycotoxin co contamination of food and feed: meta analysis of publications describing toxicological interactions. Animal Feed Science and Technology 163, 293–301.

Heinl, S., Hartinger, D., Thamhesl, M., Vekiru, E., Krska, R., Schatzmayr, G., Moll, W.D., Grabherr, R., 2010. Degradation of fumonisin B1 by the consecutive action of two bacterial enzymes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 76, 4349–4357.

Kansas State University, 2015. Mycotoxins in Swine Diets. K State Research and Extension, Manhattan, KS. https://www.asi.k-state.edu/extension/swine/swinenutritionguide/pdf/KSU%20Mycotoxins%20in%20Swine%20Diets%20fact%20sheet.pdf.

Masching, S., Naehrer, K., Schwartz-Zimmermann, H.E., Sarandan, M., Schaumberger, S., Schatzmayr, G., Applegate, T.J., 2016. Gastrointestinal degradation of fumonisin B1 by a fumonisin esterase and impact on pig performance. Animal Feed Science and Technology 220, 58–67.

Merrill, A.H., Sullards, M.C., Wang, E., Voss, K.A., Riley, R.T., 2001. Sphingolipid metabolism: roles in signal transduction and disruption by fumonisins. Environmental Health Perspectives 109, 283–289.

Paczosa, D.B., Chevalier, T.B., Adedokun, S.A., Zheng, L., Lindemann, M.D., 2025. Evaluation of increasing levels of mycotoxin containing corn fines and mitigants on nursery pig growth performance. Transl Anim Sci. 2025 Feb 18;9:txaf025. doi: 10.1093/tas/txaf025. PMID: 40083363; PMCID: PMC11905220.

Riley, R.T., Wang, E., Merrill, A.H., 1993. Liquid chromatographic determination of sphinganine and sphingosine as an indicator of fumonisin exposure. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 118, 105–112.

Rotter, B.A., Thompson, B.K., Lessard, M., Trenholm, H.L., Tryphonas, H., 1996. Influence of low level exposure to Fusarium mycotoxins on selected immunological and hematological parameters in growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 74, 206–214.

Wang, E., Norred, W.P., Bacon, C.W., Riley, R.T., Merrill, A.H., 1991. Inhibition of sphingolipid biosynthesis by fumonisins: implications for diseases associated with Fusarium moniliforme. Journal of Biological Chemistry 266, 14486–14490.

Published on

18 May 2026

Tags

  • Swine
  • Mycotoxins
  • Fumonisins

Related Articles

  • Mycotoxin Outlook for 2025 Harvest – Part 2

    Mycotoxin Outlook for 2025 Harvest – Part 2

    20 Oct 2025

    In the September issue of The Digest, we provided an overview of some of the stressors and scenarios that influence the risk for mycotoxins in crops. As harvest progresses throughout the Corn Belt, we will continue to source samples and begin to characterize 2025 contamination as part of our annual mycotoxin survey. This article will dig deeper into the environmental conditions which occurred this growing season and use those observations to predict what contamination might look like within the 2025 corn crop while we patiently wait as our survey dataset grows.

  • Mycotoxin Outlook for 2025 Harvest – Part 1

    Mycotoxin Outlook for 2025 Harvest – Part 1

    15 Sep 2025

    Variable = one good word to describe planting and growing conditions for the 2025 crop year. This is true across the country and applies within locations too as variable temperature and precipitation patterns have occurred this year. Realistically, that’s not that unusual but it seems like more places have gone from one extreme to the other since spring. The USDA recently released record yield projections (188.8 bushels per acre) and increased acres of corn planted to the highest acreage since 1937. Despite the record production projections, there are rumblings from the field about disease pressures in various areas which could limit the potential for a record harvest. Mycotoxins can occur even when yields are good. So, what mycotoxins could we expect in new crops knowing conditions have varied and there is disease out there? This article is the first in a series sharing insights into potential mycotoxin contamination patterns in the 2025 corn crop.

  • Antinutrients in feed and their effects on immunity, productivity and health of swine

    Antinutrients in feed and their effects on immunity, productivity and health of swine

    19 May 2025

    Diet formulation during early life is critical to future growth outcomes because the mucosal immune system and digestive capacity of pigs does not mature until around 8 weeks of age. During this period, and especially around the time of weaning, piglets are highly susceptible to external stressors, including from antinutrients in the diet. Responding to these stressors requires nutrients and energy which are redirected away from growth, impacting on performance. Antinutrients of most concern in piglet diets include allergens in feed raw materials, mycotoxins, peptidoglycans and undigested nutrients.